Businesses – especially large multinational companies – rely heavily on data center services. With practically everyone depending on technology to carry on their businesses, this is but part of the natural progression of things. Of course, there is always the issue of security; and that’s where entities like Secode AB come into the picture.

Secode AB is a company that specializes in managed security services, or MSS. As a matter of fact, they have been at the forefront of this industry in Europe for many years. They’re known for providing high quality managed data center service, and earlier this month, another big player entered the playing field.

NTT Communications, which is definitely one of the most recognizable names in the world of technology, communication, management solutions, etc., has acquired Secode AB. The acquisition was announced earlier this month, although the exact terms have not been released to the public.

What is important is that northern European customers who have a great need for security services for data centers will be enjoying the benefits that both companies can offer. With all the resources of NTT backing Secode AB up, businesses operating in northern Europe can be more assured of 24/7 services to deal with the ever present security threats. Some areas that are covered include intrusion detection and prevention, log management, vulnerability analysis, data-loss prevention, anti-virus and anti-spam, managed VPN/firewall, and mobile security.

This development is sure to be welcomed with open arms by concerned parties all over Europe.  Current Secode SEO Trygve Reinertsen will continue to head the new subsidiary.

Tags: data-centers, it-security, managed data center service, managed security services, northern Europe, NTT Communications, Secode AB

Categories: Network Security, News, Storage

Leave a Comment

Greg Schulz of Computerworld shared some guidelines of tape virtualization. Tape virtualization is one of the popular topics when it come to storage. Some of the said advantages of making virtual tape libraries would include improvement of the performance of the back up, archiving and other related processes and smooth transition (from tape-based to disk-based).

Here are the ten points he raised in his article:

1. Integration of VTL in your business continuity, conditions of your site/location.
2. Storage devices to be attached to the VTL.
3. Projected storage capacity needed in the future.
4. Backup, archiving, etc. software supported.
5. Support of differencing or single-instance repository capabilities.
6. Determine if you are looking for a turnkey solution.
7. Resiliency and redundancy needed.
8. Security level needed.
9. Tape device and library emulation for your environment.
10. Necessary changes to your current setup.

The questions he raised in his article really make you consider your needs and the conditions of your system. All these questions will help you evaluate if you would use virtualization. You cannot just decide right away if you will use VTL because it could affect your system in a major way.

It is always good to look at the possibilities before arriving at some decisions like this one. It is best to do a full study before you spend on it. One of the important things you also have to consider would be the people who would be in charge of this project in your company. Who will be the ones in charge of the study and the follow up in case you do push through with it. Your data will be at stake so it is better to be safe than sorry.

Tags: Backups, Physical Security, Storage, Tips

Categories: Backups, Physical Security, Storage, Tips

Leave a Comment

Viruses and malware issues are far from being a thing of the past. On the contrary, they seem to grow large by numbers as each day passes. Thus the works of security software companies have their work cut out for them. There is not definite date to which such threats and intrusions would wholly be resolved.

For the time being, it would be advisable for people to scan third party storage devices such as diskettes, USB drives and mobile storages to be safe and sound. These wandering viruses can attack at any time and this is a fact anywhere computer related materials are concerned.

Files can go as far as infecting the executable files, hence document, excel and compiled scripts are baits for immediate infection and malicious intrusions. Software applications also have their limits as their development teams cater only to a specific genre for known harmful files. But it is better to lower the risk of intrusion than not having protection at all.

[tags]scan, spyware, virus, infections, spyware, malware, trojans[/tags]

Tags: infections, Malware, scan, Spyware, trojans, virus

Categories: Backups, IT Security Basics, Malware, Network Security, Operating Systems, Programming, Real-World Issues, Security Policies, Spyware, Storage, Tips, Wireless Security

Comments Off

The growth in the use of removable storage devices has been evident in the past years and while they mainly just carry files made up of audio, video or simple documents and worksheets, they are vulnerable to virus attacks. How do they get them? Well for one, you never know if the original location of the file you were working on was virus free. This is assuming that you are transporting the file from one PC to another.

Also, you can never be too sure that once you plug on the usual USB drive from one computer to another, viruses may sneak past you. They may be equipped with anti-virus software but somehow you have to be amazed at how they breach the computer guards and make their way on USB drives.

So what is a person to do? Well for one, stick to the old practice of scanning a removable storage device first before you open any file on it. It may take a long time to finish, especially if the device is large in terms of capacity but nothing beats waiting than making sure you are protected.

Further, people fascinated with these miniature storage devices could care less if their files are infected. Sometimes it is not the file but the operating system that these storage devices contain. But make sure about it that while they have operating systems of their own, they do not have virus protection. Just be cautious, since that is the best you can do for now.

Source

Tags: storage device, usb, viruses

Categories: Malware, Operating Systems, Spyware, Storage

Leave a Comment

We are all aware of the various scams that are rampant over the web so don’t be surprised if you find them suddenly making their way to your mailbox. While it seems that being more aware of attachments and pictures in emails has been covered, email scammers are still on the go and they have made the whole process simpler. These days, they do it using simple links that are sent via email and one click alone can make a difference. A difference towards the worst that is.

URL direction to a certain site will always be dangerous. Especially if you find it suddenly stressed in your email, be cautious. For one thing, identify if you know the sender. If you don’t know them, don’t click on the links. Actually, if you don’t know the sender, then it would be best to delete the message and don’t bother reading it. For sure, you know to whom you have given your emails so you should know better.

They were all the rage last year, but image and file attachment spam is definitely out in 2008, as spammers abandon complex techniques for simpler URL-based methods.

Around 90 per cent of all spam messages are now URL based, according to a recent report from IBM’s Internet Security Systems (ISS) X-Force, Big Blue’s Internet threat research and development team.

Source

The best way to protect yourself from these scammers is to just be careful. Don’t click on links as if you are interested. Research a bit and look for scams. Or better yet, if you see bad English composition in the email coming from someone you don’t know, then consider it scam and spam.

Tags: email, links, scammers, spam, url, urls

Categories: IT Security Basics, Malware, Storage

Leave a Comment

If you happen to be a small or medium scale company that cannot afford multiple data stores and infinite numbers of mirrored hard drives, that becomes a problem. An encrypted hard disk in a laptop that gets banged up damaging the hard disk may still have some of the information intact enough for recovery but damage some of the vital keys and software and you are left hanging by a thread or down in the gutters. Data recovery is possible but only through expensive methods with the hard disks being opened up, the platters extracted and installed into another similar hard disk for data extraction. Only the military and federal government would have enough cash to burn in terms of data recovery at that level for the price is computed in the amount of megabytes recovered and on a per hard disk basis, and imagine a 1 terabyte drive at say $50/MB then you’d be scratching your head by now, and that’s just for a single drive.
The risks of identity theft and information leakage is real but the technology is still quite prone to failure even with today’s quad-core which is why we didn’t discuss the performance issue in the discussion. Today’s multi-core processors are capable of handling complex tasks such as real time encryption and decryption as if there was nothing happening on the background. The performance issue has been addressed by more powerful microprocessors but the reliability of the hard disks which stores the information and even the CD’s are still quite weak. Till there is more definite proof that all parts of the computer has reached such a reliable level that failure is a less of a factor more people would still retain their own proprietary security measures (birthday passwords, flash thumb drives that always get lost and physically carrying their discs with them).

Tags: encryption, Security Policies

Categories: Backups, Cryptography, General, IT Security Basics, Malware, Network Security, Operating Systems, Physical Security, Real-World Issues, Storage, Wireless Security

Leave a Comment

Encryption used to be the mainstay of military and other government agencies who need to secure the information they handled preventing anybody who may get access rendering the information useless. Everybody knows about it yet not many use it for the protection of their vital information stores, why? Well there are a hundred reasons why people mistrusts such an extreme measure as encrypting data and one is reliability of technology on which it is used on. Computers as we know have become cheaper and cheaper that has been good on one side but it also raises the risk of failure due to cheaper parts and higher risk for data loss due to failure. I know a lot of people would be going against me on this one but if you have experienced a hard disk crash during my many years of computer use and association with them in my previous line of work as a technical support supervisor, you’d know what I mean.
The technology we have today is of the highest level of quality and technological complexity of the computers I started to work with (386’s and 486’s) but the robustness of these gadgets and gizmos we call peripherals are still quite low except for the extreme types that are too expensive for the ordinary user to afford. Imagine a failed motherboard that has fried circuits, no problem for the hard disks are seldom affected by such incidents. Get the board out and swap it out and you connect the hard disk and you have your data available. Imagine you have a failure in the hard drive itself; you get some software and try to recover that information hoping you get enough of the sensitive files your boss needs in the morning. Now, imagine having a hard disk that was encrypted and had some of its sectors rendered useless, now that’s a nightmare for the encrypted data is useless with the key and the code stored into the hard disk itself.

Tags: data-recovery, data-security, encryption, Hard Disk Failure, hardware-failure, Risks

Categories: Cryptography, General, IT Security Basics, Real-World Issues, Storage

1 Comment

Due to the recent problems associated with the loss of government laptops and security breaches such as the incident where the laptop of a Federal Trade Official was reported to have been compromised by reportedly Chinese operatives while on a trip overseas, the US Federal government has begun to encrypt their laptops in hopes of bolstering their security to prevent such security risks in the future. Let us just hope that they do it fast enough for no one wants to get their personal and financial information released online or obtained by enemies of the state (terrorists in layman’s terms). Of the estimated 2 million laptops the US government and the many agencies have, only 800,000 have had the encryption system developed by the Department of Defense and the General Services Administration.
Encryption is one of the most secure way pf keeping data safe from unauthorized access which renders them useless without the proper software or security keys. Comparable to the dial combination on a bank vault, the encryption process turns files onto a useless bundle of information that cannot be read or used for other purposes.
All this effort to boost security of information that is gathered and collated by the various agencies and even private businesses that have ties with the government though contracts have had their computers encrypted to ensure the information they handle and use stays secure and out of the hands of criminals who aim to use them against the government.

Tags: data-encryption, data-security, encryption, Federal Government

Categories: Cryptography, General, IT Security Basics, Real-World Issues, Security Policies, Storage

Leave a Comment

As the evolution of the lowly hard drive goes with the increase of storage capacity into the terabyte range and hardware based-encryption it seems that data cannot be more secure once it is stored within the said hard disk. Well, according to WindowsIt Pro, not totally for based on their testing of several hard drives that come as wireless removable storage devices you connect to your USB 2.0 ports, it ain’t that secure after all. The device/s tested was even secured by a wireless security key that used rfid technology to unlock the drive for use by authorized users only (which in the real world is anyone who has the keychain key).
The name and brand which we would not name for obvious reasons have indeed admitted the weakness and that the advertised capability of the drive was wrong. As it turns out, the true 128-bit AES security system was used only by the RF chip and the controller on the drive which was easily defeated by removing the drive from the case and connecting to a now standard SATA drive connector. The drive was encrypted, but not at the ‘military grade’ levels that were advertised for the encryption chip used only a basic encryption level which was not up to par with accepted high-encryption standards.

Both the manufacturers of the controller boards, casing and key, have acknowledged the flaw and promise a more robust system (which is to use a more secure encryption chip that is said to come out this year but is still only in development) by the end of the year. So we guess the false advertising with regards to the encryption standard of the drives should be changed from ‘Strong 128-bit AES encryption’ to ’standard encryption’, which would only be fair for people do make choices based on the products qualities and capabilities.

Tags: data-security, Encrypted Hard Drives, encryption

Categories: Backups, Cryptography, General, IT Security Basics, News, Physical Security, Real-World Issues, Security Policies, Storage

1 Comment

Security cameras in its many shapes and forms have evolved into more of a necessity rather than a luxury usually available to those firms who could afford it. Developments in CCD technology and miniaturization of electronics components have allowed the price to fall steady making them widely available and easy to deploy. Similar to webcams, IP based security systems like the one from LPM, are now more and more becoming well accepted for like VoIP, it allows the video feed from a site hundreds of miles away to be sent over the internet to a security center in the company’s security center allowing centralized monitoring of warehouses and other facilities that would otherwise need security personnel saving in manpower costs.

The technology has evolved to a point that all one needs for IP-based security surveillance monitoring is a peripheral card one installs into the standard PC and the necessary cameras that are desired. Another deterrent of security systems of past was the requirement for extensive cabling which can be quite costly if one wishes to monitor a large area which needs to have all supporting cabling installed (power, video feed cables, audio cables, etc.). The advent of the many wireless radio communication technologies have also contributed to ease of implementation allowing wireless communication between a site’s central console and it’s subordinate cameras, who then send the information through the internet to it’s security base which can be a few blocs to hundreds of miles away.

[tags]Security Systems, Video Surveillance, Remote Security Systems, Asset Protection [/tags]

Tags: Asset-Protection, IP-Based-Surveillance, Remote-Security-Systems, Security-Systems, Video-Surveillance

Categories: Backups, General, IT Security Basics, Network Security, News, Physical Security, Privacy & Anonymity, Real-World Issues, Security Policies, Storage

Leave a Comment